Applicaster vs QuickCast
Applicaster vs QuickCast, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Applicaster is on 48/100 and QuickCast on 32/100.
Where each one leads
Applicaster
- our overall score: 48/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 58/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 39 against 3
- headcount growth: -3.3% against -8.0%
- LinkedIn following: 5,139 against 861
QuickCast
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 36/100
At a glance
| Measure | Applicaster | QuickCast |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Applicaster provides a no/low-code app management platform for content owners and OTT providers to build and manage their video applications. | QuickCast empowers content creators to build, manage, distribute, and monetize FAST channels and custom-branded TV apps. |
| Category | Low Code, No Code, OTT, Media | Media, Content, Creator Economy, Media Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Applicaster | QuickCast |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 3 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -3.3% | -8.0% |
| Total funding | $41.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Bootstrapped |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,139 | 861 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Applicaster | QuickCast |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 32/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 6/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Applicaster | QuickCast |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Applicaster | QuickCast |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 1 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“BroadcastAsia: MediaCorp announces new 'Toggle Now TV' developed by Applicaster.”r/denofgeek
Applicaster vs QuickCast: common questions
Which is better, Applicaster or QuickCast?
On our 0-100 score Applicaster rates higher (48/100 against 32/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Applicaster and QuickCast compare on the numbers?
Applicaster leads on our overall score (48/100 against 32/100), domain rating (58/100 against 29/100), headcount (39 against 3), headcount growth (-3.3% against -8.0%), LinkedIn following (5,139 against 861). QuickCast leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 36/100).
What do real users say about Applicaster and QuickCast?
Applicaster: 1 positive and 1 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/denofgeek.
Read the full Applicaster review and pricing or the QuickCast review and pricing. You can also browse other Applicaster alternatives we track.