Applicaster vs Mendix
Applicaster vs Mendix, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Applicaster is on 48/100 and Mendix on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Applicaster
- headcount growth: -3.3% against -20.6%
Mendix
- our overall score: 63/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 77/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 1,028 against 39
- funding raised: $63.0M against $41.5M
- LinkedIn following: 91,109 against 5,139
At a glance
| Measure | Applicaster | Mendix |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Applicaster provides a no/low-code app management platform for content owners and OTT providers to build and manage their video applications. | Cloud-based low-code platform for rapid enterprise application development. |
| Category | Low Code, No Code, OTT, Media | Low Code, Application Development Platform, Enterprise Software, Digital Transformation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2009 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Rotterdam, Netherlands |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Applicaster | Mendix |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 1,028 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -3.3% | -20.6% |
| Total funding | $41.5M | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $730M |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,139 | 91,109 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Applicaster | Mendix |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 77/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Applicaster | Mendix |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Applicaster | Mendix |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 1 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“BroadcastAsia: MediaCorp announces new 'Toggle Now TV' developed by Applicaster.”r/denofgeek
Applicaster vs Mendix: common questions
Which is better, Applicaster or Mendix?
On our 0-100 score Mendix rates higher (63/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Applicaster and Mendix compare on the numbers?
Applicaster leads on headcount growth (-3.3% against -20.6%). Mendix leads on our overall score (63/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 36/100), domain rating (77/100 against 58/100), headcount (1,028 against 39), funding raised ($63.0M against $41.5M), LinkedIn following (91,109 against 5,139).
What do real users say about Applicaster and Mendix?
Applicaster: 1 positive and 1 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/denofgeek.
Read the full Applicaster review and pricing or the Mendix review and pricing. You can also browse other Applicaster alternatives we track.