Applicaster vs Caspio
Applicaster vs Caspio, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Applicaster is on 48/100 and Caspio on 31/100.
Where each one leads
Applicaster
- our overall score: 48/100 against 31/100
- headcount growth: -3.3% against -34.8%
Caspio
- agent readiness: 63/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 198 against 39
- LinkedIn following: 8,343 against 5,139
At a glance
| Measure | Applicaster | Caspio |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Applicaster provides a no/low-code app management platform for content owners and OTT providers to build and manage their video applications. | Cloud-based low-code platform for building custom online database applications and workflow tools. |
| Category | Low Code, No Code, OTT, Media | Low Code, No Code, Database, Workflow Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2009 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Applicaster | Caspio |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 198 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -3.3% | -34.8% |
| Total funding | $41.5M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,139 | 8,343 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Applicaster | Caspio |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 31/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | C (63/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Applicaster | Caspio |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Applicaster | Caspio |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 1 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“BroadcastAsia: MediaCorp announces new 'Toggle Now TV' developed by Applicaster.”r/denofgeek
Applicaster vs Caspio: common questions
Which is better, Applicaster or Caspio?
On our 0-100 score Applicaster rates higher (48/100 against 31/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Applicaster and Caspio compare on the numbers?
Applicaster leads on our overall score (48/100 against 31/100), headcount growth (-3.3% against -34.8%). Caspio leads on agent readiness (63/100 against 36/100), domain rating (80/100 against 58/100), headcount (198 against 39), LinkedIn following (8,343 against 5,139).
What do real users say about Applicaster and Caspio?
Applicaster: 1 positive and 1 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/denofgeek.
Read the full Applicaster review and pricing or the Caspio review and pricing. You can also browse other Applicaster alternatives we track.