Appian vs Tungsten Automation
Appian vs Tungsten Automation, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Appian is on 39/100 and Tungsten Automation on 29/100.
Where each one leads
Appian
- our overall score: 39/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 2,536 against 1,565
- LinkedIn following: 249,145 against 63,229
Tungsten Automation
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 38/100
At a glance
| Measure | Appian | Tungsten Automation |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Appian provides a low-code platform that enables organizations to rapidly build, deploy, and manage enterprise applications. | Intelligent automation platform for business process optimization and digital transformation. |
| Category | Low-Code Development, Business Process Management, Workflow Automation, Robotic Process Automation | Intelligent Automation, Robotic Process Automation, Intelligent Document Processing, Business Process Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 1999 | 1985 |
| Headquarters | McLean, United States | Irvine, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Appian | Tungsten Automation |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,536 | 1,565 |
| Total funding | $47.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 249,145 | 63,229 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Appian | Tungsten Automation |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 29/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Appian | Tungsten Automation |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Appian vs Tungsten Automation: common questions
Which is better, Appian or Tungsten Automation?
On our 0-100 score Appian rates higher (39/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Appian and Tungsten Automation compare on the numbers?
Appian leads on our overall score (39/100 against 29/100), headcount (2,536 against 1,565), LinkedIn following (249,145 against 63,229). Tungsten Automation leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 38/100).
Read the full Appian review and pricing or the Tungsten Automation review and pricing. You can also browse other Appian alternatives we track.