Appian vs Quickbase
Appian vs Quickbase, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Appian is on 39/100 and Quickbase on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Appian
- headcount: 2,536 against 814
- LinkedIn following: 249,145 against 27,996
Quickbase
- our overall score: 69/100 against 39/100
- funding raised: $1.0B against $47.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Appian | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Appian provides a low-code platform that enables organizations to rapidly build, deploy, and manage enterprise applications. | Low-code application platform for work management, centralizing complex projects and processes. |
| Category | Low-Code Development, Business Process Management, Workflow Automation, Robotic Process Automation | Work Management, Low-Code Development, Application Platform, Business Process Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1999 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | McLean, United States | Waltham, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Appian | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,536 | 814 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -24.4% |
| Total funding | $47.5M | $1.0B |
| Latest round | Series B | Acquisition |
| LinkedIn followers | 249,145 | 27,996 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Appian | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Appian | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Appian vs Quickbase: common questions
Which is better, Appian or Quickbase?
On our 0-100 score Quickbase rates higher (69/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Appian and Quickbase compare on the numbers?
Appian leads on headcount (2,536 against 814), LinkedIn following (249,145 against 27,996). Quickbase leads on our overall score (69/100 against 39/100), funding raised ($1.0B against $47.5M).
Read the full Appian review and pricing or the Quickbase review and pricing. You can also browse other Appian alternatives we track.