Appian vs OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications
Appian vs OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Appian is on 39/100 and OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications on 22/100.
Where each one leads
Appian
- our overall score: 39/100 against 22/100
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 21/100
- LinkedIn following: 249,145 against 185,312
OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Appian | OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Appian provides a low-code platform that enables organizations to rapidly build, deploy, and manage enterprise applications. | An AI-powered low-code platform for building enterprise applications and agents. |
| Category | Low-Code Development, Business Process Management, Workflow Automation, Robotic Process Automation | Low-Code Development, Enterprise Software, AI Development Platform, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1999 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | McLean, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Appian | OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,536 | 2,231 |
| Total funding | $47.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 249,145 | 185,312 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Appian | OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 22/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 20/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Appian | OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Amplitude |
Appian vs OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications: common questions
Which is better, Appian or OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications?
On our 0-100 score Appian rates higher (39/100 against 22/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Appian and OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications compare on the numbers?
Appian leads on our overall score (39/100 against 22/100), agent readiness (38/100 against 21/100), LinkedIn following (249,145 against 185,312).
Read the full Appian review and pricing or the OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications review and pricing. You can also browse other Appian alternatives we track.