Appian vs Nintex
Appian vs Nintex, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Appian is on 39/100 and Nintex on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Appian
- headcount: 2,536 against 1,198
- funding raised: $47.5M against $29.0M
- LinkedIn following: 249,145 against 60,468
Nintex
- our overall score: 51/100 against 39/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 38/100
At a glance
| Measure | Appian | Nintex |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Appian provides a low-code platform that enables organizations to rapidly build, deploy, and manage enterprise applications. | Workflow automation and process management software for businesses. |
| Category | Low-Code Development, Business Process Management, Workflow Automation, Robotic Process Automation | Automation & RPA, Workflow Automation, Business Process Management, Low-Code Development |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 1999 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | McLean, United States | Bellevue, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Appian | Nintex |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,536 | 1,198 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -15.1% |
| Total funding | $47.5M | $29.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 249,145 | 60,468 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Appian | Nintex |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 77/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Appian | Nintex |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Appian vs Nintex: common questions
Which is better, Appian or Nintex?
On our 0-100 score Nintex rates higher (51/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Appian and Nintex compare on the numbers?
Appian leads on headcount (2,536 against 1,198), funding raised ($47.5M against $29.0M), LinkedIn following (249,145 against 60,468). Nintex leads on our overall score (51/100 against 39/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 38/100).
Read the full Appian review and pricing or the Nintex review and pricing. You can also browse other Appian alternatives we track.