Appian vs Caspio
Appian vs Caspio, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Appian is on 39/100 and Caspio on 31/100.
Where each one leads
Appian
- our overall score: 39/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 2,536 against 198
- LinkedIn following: 249,145 against 8,343
Caspio
- agent readiness: 63/100 against 38/100
At a glance
| Measure | Appian | Caspio |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Appian provides a low-code platform that enables organizations to rapidly build, deploy, and manage enterprise applications. | Cloud-based low-code platform for building custom online database applications and workflow tools. |
| Category | Low-Code Development, Business Process Management, Workflow Automation, Robotic Process Automation | Low Code, No Code, Database, Workflow Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1999 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | McLean, United States | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Appian | Caspio |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,536 | 198 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -34.8% |
| Total funding | $47.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 249,145 | 8,343 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Appian | Caspio |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 31/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | C (63/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Appian | Caspio |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Appian vs Caspio: common questions
Which is better, Appian or Caspio?
On our 0-100 score Appian rates higher (39/100 against 31/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Appian and Caspio compare on the numbers?
Appian leads on our overall score (39/100 against 31/100), headcount (2,536 against 198), LinkedIn following (249,145 against 8,343). Caspio leads on agent readiness (63/100 against 38/100).
Read the full Appian review and pricing or the Caspio review and pricing. You can also browse other Appian alternatives we track.