Append Medical vs Radiaction
Append Medical vs Radiaction, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Append Medical is on 51/100 and Radiaction on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Append Medical
- domain rating: 25/100 against 15/100
- headcount growth: +20.5% against +1.4%
Radiaction
- our overall score: 57/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 21/100
- funding raised: $46.3M against $11.8M
At a glance
| Measure | Append Medical | Radiaction |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops a novel device for complete left atrial appendage closure to prevent blood clots and strokes. | Radiaction Medical revolutionizes radiation protection for interventional medical teams with innovative, user-independent shielding solutions. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Device, MedTech, HealthTech | Healthcare, Medical Device, Radiation, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Append Medical | Radiaction |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 30 | 26 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +20.5% | +1.4% |
| Total funding | $11.8M | $46.3M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,230 | 2,766 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Append Medical | Radiaction |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 25/100 | 15/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Append Medical | Radiaction |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Append Medical vs Radiaction: common questions
Which is better, Append Medical or Radiaction?
On our 0-100 score Radiaction rates higher (57/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Append Medical and Radiaction compare on the numbers?
Append Medical leads on domain rating (25/100 against 15/100), headcount growth (+20.5% against +1.4%). Radiaction leads on our overall score (57/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 21/100), funding raised ($46.3M against $11.8M).
Read the full Append Medical review and pricing or the Radiaction review and pricing. You can also browse other Append Medical alternatives we track.