Append Medical vs Body Vision Medical
Append Medical vs Body Vision Medical, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Append Medical is on 51/100 and Body Vision Medical on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Append Medical
- headcount growth: +20.5% against -9.3%
Body Vision Medical
- our overall score: 58/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 21/100
- funding raised: $28.5M against $11.8M
- LinkedIn following: 6,475 against 2,230
At a glance
| Measure | Append Medical | Body Vision Medical |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops a novel device for complete left atrial appendage closure to prevent blood clots and strokes. | Develops AI-driven, real-time intraoperative imaging for early lung cancer diagnostics and treatment. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Device, MedTech, HealthTech | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Lung, Cancer |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Campbell, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Append Medical | Body Vision Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 30 | 32 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +20.5% | -9.3% |
| Total funding | $11.8M | $28.5M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,230 | 6,475 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Append Medical | Body Vision Medical |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 3/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 25/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Append Medical | Body Vision Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Wix |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Append Medical | Body Vision Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 1.0/5 from 1 vote |
Append Medical vs Body Vision Medical: common questions
Which is better, Append Medical or Body Vision Medical?
On our 0-100 score Body Vision Medical rates higher (58/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Append Medical and Body Vision Medical compare on the numbers?
Append Medical leads on headcount growth (+20.5% against -9.3%). Body Vision Medical leads on our overall score (58/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (43/100 against 21/100), funding raised ($28.5M against $11.8M), LinkedIn following (6,475 against 2,230).
Read the full Append Medical review and pricing or the Body Vision Medical review and pricing. You can also browse other Append Medical alternatives we track.