AppCentral vs StackAdapt
AppCentral vs StackAdapt, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AppCentral is on 36/100 and StackAdapt on 67/100.
Where each one leads
AppCentral
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
StackAdapt
- our overall score: 67/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 1,707 against 36
- LinkedIn following: 78,144 against 692
At a glance
| Measure | AppCentral | StackAdapt |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered publishing house for app developers to boost growth and profit. | A leading multi-channel programmatic advertising platform powered by AI and automation. |
| Category | App Store Optimization, Marketing Automation, AI-Powered Marketing, Mobile App Growth | AdTech, MarTech, Programmatic Advertising, Demand-Side Platform (DSP) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Toronto, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AppCentral | StackAdapt |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 36 | 1,707 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -46.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $535M |
| Latest round | Not published | Growth |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 692 | 78,144 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AppCentral | StackAdapt |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 36/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 16/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 22/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AppCentral | StackAdapt |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Wix | WordPress |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
AppCentral vs StackAdapt: common questions
Which is better, AppCentral or StackAdapt?
On our 0-100 score StackAdapt rates higher (67/100 against 36/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AppCentral and StackAdapt compare on the numbers?
StackAdapt leads on our overall score (67/100 against 36/100), domain rating (78/100 against 22/100), headcount (1,707 against 36), LinkedIn following (78,144 against 692).
Read the full AppCentral review and pricing or the StackAdapt review and pricing. You can also browse other AppCentral alternatives we track.