ApolloShield vs R2 Wireless
ApolloShield vs R2 Wireless, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ApolloShield is on 47/100 and R2 Wireless on 51/100.
Where each one leads
ApolloShield
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
R2 Wireless
- our overall score: 51/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 29/100 against 20/100
- headcount: 25 against 4
- funding raised: $13.0M against $500K
- LinkedIn following: 2,153 against 1,003
At a glance
| Measure | ApolloShield | R2 Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Detects, blocks, and tracks unauthorized drone intrusions, securing airspace for critical infrastructure and events. | Provides advanced wireless sensing solutions for identifying and countering wireless threats across various protocols and frequencies. |
| Category | Drones, Cybersecurity, Homeland Security, Defense Tech | Smart City, Infrastructure, Surveillance, Monitoring |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2015 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Diego, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ApolloShield | R2 Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4 | 25 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +288.6% |
| Total funding | $500K | $13.0M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Unknown |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,003 | 2,153 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ApolloShield | R2 Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 35/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 52/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 20/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ApolloShield | R2 Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Segment | Jetpack Stats |
ApolloShield vs R2 Wireless: common questions
Which is better, ApolloShield or R2 Wireless?
On our 0-100 score R2 Wireless rates higher (51/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ApolloShield and R2 Wireless compare on the numbers?
R2 Wireless leads on our overall score (51/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 21/100), domain rating (29/100 against 20/100), headcount (25 against 4), funding raised ($13.0M against $500K), LinkedIn following (2,153 against 1,003).
Read the full ApolloShield review and pricing or the R2 Wireless review and pricing. You can also browse other ApolloShield alternatives we track.

