Apollo vs Renaissance Philanthropy
Apollo vs Renaissance Philanthropy, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apollo is on 61/100 and Renaissance Philanthropy on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Apollo
- our overall score: 61/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 34/100
Renaissance Philanthropy
- domain rating: 60/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 112 against 63
- funding raised: $214M against $50.0M
- LinkedIn following: 18,130 against 5,702
At a glance
| Measure | Apollo | Renaissance Philanthropy |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing flexible, efficient, and low-cost solar cells to turn any surface into an energy source. | Fueling a 21st-century renaissance by increasing the ambition of philanthropists, scientists, and innovators. |
| Category | Energy, Solar, Photovoltaics (PV), Clean Energy | Philanthropy, Venture Creation, Deep Tech, Agriculture Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | Services |
| Founded | 2015 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Ramat Gan, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apollo | Renaissance Philanthropy |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 63 | 112 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +1.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $50.0M | $214M |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,702 | 18,130 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apollo | Renaissance Philanthropy |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (34/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 31/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apollo | Renaissance Philanthropy |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Squarespace |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
Apollo vs Renaissance Philanthropy: common questions
Which is better, Apollo or Renaissance Philanthropy?
On our 0-100 score Apollo rates higher (61/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apollo and Renaissance Philanthropy compare on the numbers?
Apollo leads on our overall score (61/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 34/100). Renaissance Philanthropy leads on domain rating (60/100 against 31/100), headcount (112 against 63), funding raised ($214M against $50.0M), LinkedIn following (18,130 against 5,702).
Read the full Apollo review and pricing or the Renaissance Philanthropy review and pricing. You can also browse other Apollo alternatives we track.

