Apollo vs Orsted
Apollo vs Orsted, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apollo is on 61/100 and Orsted on 29/100.
Where each one leads
Apollo
- our overall score: 61/100 against 29/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 25/100
- headcount growth: +1.2% against -11.1%
Orsted
- domain rating: 76/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 9,399 against 63
- funding raised: $9.4B against $50.0M
- LinkedIn following: 575,414 against 5,702
At a glance
| Measure | Apollo | Orsted |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing flexible, efficient, and low-cost solar cells to turn any surface into an energy source. | Global leader in offshore wind power, driving the transition to renewable energy. |
| Category | Energy, Solar, Photovoltaics (PV), Clean Energy | Energy, Climate Tech, Wind Energy, Renewable Energy |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Services |
| Founded | 2015 | 1972 |
| Headquarters | Ramat Gan, Israel | Fredericia, Denmark |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apollo | Orsted |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 63 | 9,399 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +1.2% | -11.1% |
| Total funding | $50.0M | $9.4B |
| Latest round | Not published | Rights Issue |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,702 | 575,414 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apollo | Orsted |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 29/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 15/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 32/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apollo | Orsted |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Apollo | Orsted |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 2 negative across 4 threads |
“US Judge Rules Trump Cannot Block Offshore Wind Project, Orsted Shares Jump. The ruling is a legal setback for Trump, who has sought to block expansion of offshore wind.”r/energy
Apollo vs Orsted: common questions
Which is better, Apollo or Orsted?
On our 0-100 score Apollo rates higher (61/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apollo and Orsted compare on the numbers?
Apollo leads on our overall score (61/100 against 29/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 25/100), headcount growth (+1.2% against -11.1%). Orsted leads on domain rating (76/100 against 32/100), headcount (9,399 against 63), funding raised ($9.4B against $50.0M), LinkedIn following (575,414 against 5,702).
What do real users say about Apollo and Orsted?
Orsted: 1 positive and 2 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/energy.
Read the full Apollo review and pricing or the Orsted review and pricing. You can also browse other Apollo alternatives we track.