Apoha vs Coefficient Bio
Apoha vs Coefficient Bio, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apoha is on 46/100 and Coefficient Bio on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Apoha
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Coefficient Bio
- our overall score: 70/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 34/100
- funding raised: $16B against $36.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Apoha | Coefficient Bio |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Pioneering Liquid State Intelligence for physical-world AI. | AI safety and research company building reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems. |
| Category | Biotechnology, Artificial Intelligence, Materials Science, Food Technology | Biotechnology, Artificial Intelligence, Healthcare, Frontier AI Lab |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apoha | Coefficient Bio |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 4,836 |
| Total funding | $36.0M | $16B |
| Latest round | Undisclosed | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $30B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 3,743,477 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apoha | Coefficient Bio |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 16/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 97/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 92/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apoha | Coefficient Bio |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Apoha | Coefficient Bio |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 6 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“Anthropic buys biotech startup Coefficient Bio in $400M deal: Reports. Anthropic moving further into life sciences and bioinformatics”r/bioinformatics
Apoha vs Coefficient Bio: common questions
Which is better, Apoha or Coefficient Bio?
On our 0-100 score Coefficient Bio rates higher (70/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apoha and Coefficient Bio compare on the numbers?
Coefficient Bio leads on our overall score (70/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 36/100), domain rating (92/100 against 34/100), funding raised ($16B against $36.0M).
What do real users say about Apoha and Coefficient Bio?
Coefficient Bio: 6 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/bioinformatics.
Read the full Apoha review and pricing or the Coefficient Bio review and pricing. You can also browse other Apoha alternatives we track.