Apiiro vs Port
Apiiro vs Port, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apiiro is on 68/100 and Port on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Apiiro
- our overall score: 68/100 against 64/100
- agent readiness: 60/100 against 52/100
- funding raised: $135M against $62.0M
Port
- headcount: 511 against 130
- headcount growth: +144.8% against +14.4%
At a glance
| Measure | Apiiro | Port |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Application security and development platform providing deep code analysis and runtime intelligence. | Developer portal and experience platform for modern engineering teams. |
| Category | Enterprise, Risk Management, Cybersecurity, Information Technology (IT) | Enterprise, DevOps, Development, Developer Tools |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apiiro | Port |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 130 | 511 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.4% | +144.8% |
| Total funding | $135M | $62.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $550M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,940 | 22,660 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apiiro | Port |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 80/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 76/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (60/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apiiro | Port |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Segment, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Not detected | Intercom, HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Apiiro vs Port: common questions
Which is better, Apiiro or Port?
On our 0-100 score Apiiro rates higher (68/100 against 64/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apiiro and Port compare on the numbers?
Apiiro leads on our overall score (68/100 against 64/100), agent readiness (60/100 against 52/100), funding raised ($135M against $62.0M). Port leads on headcount (511 against 130), headcount growth (+144.8% against +14.4%).
Read the full Apiiro review and pricing or the Port review and pricing. You can also browse other Apiiro alternatives we track.