Apiiro vs Frontegg
Apiiro vs Frontegg, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apiiro is on 68/100 and Frontegg on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Apiiro
- our overall score: 68/100 against 63/100
- agent readiness: 60/100 against 46/100
- headcount: 130 against 72
- headcount growth: +14.4% against +2.2%
- funding raised: $135M against $70.0M
- LinkedIn following: 20,940 against 8,611
Frontegg
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Apiiro | Frontegg |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Application security and development platform providing deep code analysis and runtime intelligence. | User management platform for B2B SaaS, enabling product-led growth and enterprise readiness. |
| Category | Enterprise, Risk Management, Cybersecurity, Information Technology (IT) | Enterprise, Development, Enterprise Software, B2B SaaS |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apiiro | Frontegg |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 130 | 72 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.4% | +2.2% |
| Total funding | $135M | $70.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $550M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,940 | 8,611 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apiiro | Frontegg |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 76/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (60/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apiiro | Frontegg |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Apiiro vs Frontegg: common questions
Which is better, Apiiro or Frontegg?
On our 0-100 score Apiiro rates higher (68/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apiiro and Frontegg compare on the numbers?
Apiiro leads on our overall score (68/100 against 63/100), agent readiness (60/100 against 46/100), headcount (130 against 72), headcount growth (+14.4% against +2.2%), funding raised ($135M against $70.0M), LinkedIn following (20,940 against 8,611).
Read the full Apiiro review and pricing or the Frontegg review and pricing. You can also browse other Apiiro alternatives we track.