Apify vs Webscraping
Apify vs Webscraping, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apify is on 60/100 and Webscraping on 6/100.
Where each one leads
Apify
- our overall score: 60/100 against 6/100
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 44/100
Webscraping
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Apify | Webscraping |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A platform for web scraping, data extraction, and browser automation tools. | Turn difficult websites into dependable data with anti-bot handling, JavaScript rendering, structured extraction, and programmable cloud browsers. |
| Category | Web Scraping, Data Extraction, Browser Automation, Generative AI | Web Scraping, Data Extraction, Web Scraping Services, Anti-Bot |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apify | Webscraping |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 243 | Not published |
| Total funding | $3.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,843 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apify | Webscraping |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 6/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | Not published |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Community | 13/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apify | Webscraping |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Not detected |
| Support stack | Intercom, HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Apify | Webscraping |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“I found Apify’s flexibility, Bright Data’s power, and Octoparse being easy to use… they’re all basically packaging the same underlying stuff in different ways. My buddy had recs Apify Actors to me before, but if paying for, it mostly comes ”r/automation
Apify vs Webscraping: common questions
Which is better, Apify or Webscraping?
On our 0-100 score Apify rates higher (60/100 against 6/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apify and Webscraping compare on the numbers?
Apify leads on our overall score (60/100 against 6/100), agent readiness (59/100 against 44/100).
What do real users say about Apify and Webscraping?
Apify: 2 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/automation.
Read the full Apify review and pricing or the Webscraping review and pricing. You can also browse other Apify alternatives we track.