Apify vs TrawlingWeb
Apify vs TrawlingWeb, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apify is on 60/100 and TrawlingWeb on 10/100.
Where each one leads
Apify
- our overall score: 60/100 against 10/100
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 9/100
- headcount: 243 against 10
- LinkedIn following: 25,843 against 818
TrawlingWeb
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Apify | TrawlingWeb |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A platform for web scraping, data extraction, and browser automation tools. | AI-powered web scraping and data extraction for businesses. |
| Category | Web Scraping, Data Extraction, Browser Automation, Generative AI | AI Search Engine, Agentic AI, Web Scraping, Data Extraction |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apify | TrawlingWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 243 | 10 |
| Total funding | $3.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,843 | 818 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apify | TrawlingWeb |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 10/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | Not published |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 9/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apify | TrawlingWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Google Cloud |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Intercom, HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Apify | TrawlingWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“I found Apify’s flexibility, Bright Data’s power, and Octoparse being easy to use… they’re all basically packaging the same underlying stuff in different ways. My buddy had recs Apify Actors to me before, but if paying for, it mostly comes ”r/automation
Apify vs TrawlingWeb: common questions
Which is better, Apify or TrawlingWeb?
On our 0-100 score Apify rates higher (60/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apify and TrawlingWeb compare on the numbers?
Apify leads on our overall score (60/100 against 10/100), agent readiness (59/100 against 42/100), domain rating (80/100 against 9/100), headcount (243 against 10), LinkedIn following (25,843 against 818).
What do real users say about Apify and TrawlingWeb?
Apify: 2 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/automation.
Read the full Apify review and pricing or the TrawlingWeb review and pricing. You can also browse other Apify alternatives we track.