Apify vs ScrapingBee
Apify vs ScrapingBee, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apify is on 60/100 and ScrapingBee on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Apify
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 243 against 15
- LinkedIn following: 25,843 against 1,668
ScrapingBee
- funding raised: $11.5M against $3.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Apify | ScrapingBee |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A platform for web scraping, data extraction, and browser automation tools. | API for scraping websites, handling JavaScript rendering and headless browsers. |
| Category | Web Scraping, Data Extraction, Browser Automation, Generative AI | Web Scraping, API Platform, Data Extraction, Developer Tools |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apify | ScrapingBee |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 243 | 15 |
| Total funding | $3.5M | $11.5M |
| Latest round | Seed | Acquisition |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,843 | 1,668 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apify | ScrapingBee |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apify | ScrapingBee |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Intercom, HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Apify | ScrapingBee |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“I found Apify’s flexibility, Bright Data’s power, and Octoparse being easy to use… they’re all basically packaging the same underlying stuff in different ways. My buddy had recs Apify Actors to me before, but if paying for, it mostly comes ”r/automation
Apify vs ScrapingBee: common questions
Which is better, Apify or ScrapingBee?
On our 0-100 score Apify rates higher (60/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apify and ScrapingBee compare on the numbers?
Apify leads on agent readiness (59/100 against 50/100), headcount (243 against 15), LinkedIn following (25,843 against 1,668). ScrapingBee leads on funding raised ($11.5M against $3.5M).
What do real users say about Apify and ScrapingBee?
Apify: 2 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/automation.
Read the full Apify review and pricing or the ScrapingBee review and pricing. You can also browse other Apify alternatives we track.