Apify vs BrowserUse
Apify vs BrowserUse, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apify is on 60/100 and BrowserUse on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Apify
- our overall score: 60/100 against 52/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 72/100
- headcount: 243 against 20
BrowserUse
- funding raised: $17.0M against $3.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Apify | BrowserUse |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A platform for web scraping, data extraction, and browser automation tools. | Provides tools and services for automated browser testing and scraping. |
| Category | Web Scraping, Data Extraction, Browser Automation, Generative AI | Agentic AI, AI Tool, Web Scraping, Browser Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apify | BrowserUse |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 243 | 20 |
| Total funding | $3.5M | $17.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,843 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apify | BrowserUse |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | D (59/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apify | BrowserUse |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | CloudFront | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Not detected |
| Support stack | Intercom, HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Apify | BrowserUse |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“I found Apify’s flexibility, Bright Data’s power, and Octoparse being easy to use… they’re all basically packaging the same underlying stuff in different ways. My buddy had recs Apify Actors to me before, but if paying for, it mostly comes ”r/automation
Apify vs BrowserUse: common questions
Which is better, Apify or BrowserUse?
On our 0-100 score Apify rates higher (60/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apify and BrowserUse compare on the numbers?
Apify leads on our overall score (60/100 against 52/100), domain rating (80/100 against 72/100), headcount (243 against 20). BrowserUse leads on funding raised ($17.0M against $3.5M).
What do real users say about Apify and BrowserUse?
Apify: 2 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/automation.
Read the full Apify review and pricing or the BrowserUse review and pricing. You can also browse other Apify alternatives we track.