Aphex vs Sardine
Aphex vs Sardine, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aphex is on 40/100 and Sardine on 71/100.
Where each one leads
Aphex
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Sardine
- our overall score: 71/100 against 40/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 55/100
- funding raised: $25.0M against $8.2M
At a glance
| Measure | Aphex | Sardine |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Aphex technology is used in a wide range of pro audio and prosumer applications for music, video, gaming and communications; and are licensed into a variety of audio, entertainment and communications | AI-powered risk platform for fraud prevention, compliance, and credit underwriting. |
| Category | Fintech, Automation, Compliance, Accounts Payable | Fintech, Payments, Fraud Detection, Compliance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aphex | Sardine |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 331 |
| Total funding | $8.2M | $25.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C Extension |
| Valuation | Not published | $660M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 53,578 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aphex | Sardine |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 40/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 35/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 9/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 40/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aphex | Sardine |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | CloudFront | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Segment, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager |
Aphex vs Sardine: common questions
Which is better, Aphex or Sardine?
On our 0-100 score Sardine rates higher (71/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aphex and Sardine compare on the numbers?
Sardine leads on our overall score (71/100 against 40/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 31/100), domain rating (67/100 against 55/100), funding raised ($25.0M against $8.2M).
Read the full Aphex review and pricing or the Sardine review and pricing. You can also browse other Aphex alternatives we track.