Apester vs Quiksee
Apester vs Quiksee, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apester is on 55/100 and Quiksee on 33/100.
Where each one leads
Apester
- our overall score: 55/100 against 33/100
- funding raised: $17.0M against $3.0M
Quiksee
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Apester | Quiksee |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Interactive content platform for publishers and brands to engage audiences and drive conversions. | Quiksee developed location-based interactive media solutions utilizing proprietary imaging technology, acquired by Google in 2010. |
| Category | Media, Video, AdTech, MarTech | Media, Video, Travel, 3D |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Berlin, Germany | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apester | Quiksee |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 36 | Not published |
| Total funding | $17.0M | $3.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,209 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apester | Quiksee |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 33/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 32/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 40/100 | 9/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 30/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apester | Quiksee |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
Apester vs Quiksee: common questions
Which is better, Apester or Quiksee?
On our 0-100 score Apester rates higher (55/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apester and Quiksee compare on the numbers?
Apester leads on our overall score (55/100 against 33/100), funding raised ($17.0M against $3.0M).
Read the full Apester review and pricing or the Quiksee review and pricing. You can also browse other Apester alternatives we track.