Apester vs OpenWeb
Apester vs OpenWeb, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apester is on 55/100 and OpenWeb on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Apester
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
OpenWeb
- our overall score: 63/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 251 against 36
- funding raised: $398M against $17.0M
- LinkedIn following: 29,086 against 3,209
At a glance
| Measure | Apester | OpenWeb |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Interactive content platform for publishers and brands to engage audiences and drive conversions. | OpenWeb partners with publishers and brands to foster healthy online conversations and build direct audience relationships. |
| Category | Media, Video, AdTech, MarTech | Media, Text Recognition, Text, Content Moderation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Berlin, Germany | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apester | OpenWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 36 | 251 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -9.0% |
| Total funding | $17.0M | $398M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,209 | 29,086 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apester | OpenWeb |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 40/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apester | OpenWeb |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
Apester vs OpenWeb: common questions
Which is better, Apester or OpenWeb?
On our 0-100 score OpenWeb rates higher (63/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apester and OpenWeb compare on the numbers?
OpenWeb leads on our overall score (63/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 41/100), domain rating (71/100 against 60/100), headcount (251 against 36), funding raised ($398M against $17.0M), LinkedIn following (29,086 against 3,209).
Read the full Apester review and pricing or the OpenWeb review and pricing. You can also browse other Apester alternatives we track.