APERIO vs QualiSense
APERIO vs QualiSense, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: APERIO is on 56/100 and QualiSense on 53/100.
Where each one leads
APERIO
- our overall score: 56/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 34/100 against 13/100
- headcount: 29 against 10
- funding raised: $24.0M against $8.5M
- LinkedIn following: 4,399 against 323
QualiSense
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 27/100
- headcount growth: +23.5% against +6.7%
At a glance
| Measure | APERIO | QualiSense |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Industrial data integrity solutions powered by AI to drive profitability and sustainability. | Augmented AI platform for industrial inspection using unlabeled production data. |
| Category | Industrial, Industrial Control Systems, Sensor, Data | Industrial, Inspection, Autonomous, Quality Control |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | APERIO | QualiSense |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 29 | 10 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +6.7% | +23.5% |
| Total funding | $24.0M | $8.5M |
| Latest round | Series A | Strategic |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,399 | 323 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | APERIO | QualiSense |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (27/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 13/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | APERIO | QualiSense |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
APERIO vs QualiSense: common questions
Which is better, APERIO or QualiSense?
On our 0-100 score APERIO rates higher (56/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do APERIO and QualiSense compare on the numbers?
APERIO leads on our overall score (56/100 against 53/100), domain rating (34/100 against 13/100), headcount (29 against 10), funding raised ($24.0M against $8.5M), LinkedIn following (4,399 against 323). QualiSense leads on agent readiness (38/100 against 27/100), headcount growth (+23.5% against +6.7%).
Read the full APERIO review and pricing or the QualiSense review and pricing. You can also browse other APERIO alternatives we track.