APERIO vs Kando
APERIO vs Kando, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: APERIO is on 56/100 and Kando on 62/100.
Where each one leads
APERIO
- agent readiness: 27/100 against 21/100
- headcount growth: +6.7% against -15.1%
Kando
- our overall score: 62/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 50 against 29
- funding raised: $36.0M against $24.0M
- LinkedIn following: 6,902 against 4,399
At a glance
| Measure | APERIO | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Industrial data integrity solutions powered by AI to drive profitability and sustainability. | Data intelligence platform leveraging real-time wastewater quality data for public health and environmental improvement. |
| Category | Industrial, Industrial Control Systems, Sensor, Data | Industrial, Water, IoT, Sensor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2015 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | APERIO | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 29 | 50 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +6.7% | -15.1% |
| Total funding | $24.0M | $36.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,399 | 6,902 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | APERIO | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (27/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | APERIO | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
APERIO vs Kando: common questions
Which is better, APERIO or Kando?
On our 0-100 score Kando rates higher (62/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do APERIO and Kando compare on the numbers?
APERIO leads on agent readiness (27/100 against 21/100), headcount growth (+6.7% against -15.1%). Kando leads on our overall score (62/100 against 56/100), headcount (50 against 29), funding raised ($36.0M against $24.0M), LinkedIn following (6,902 against 4,399).
Read the full APERIO review and pricing or the Kando review and pricing. You can also browse other APERIO alternatives we track.