Apeel Sciences vs Tridge
Apeel Sciences vs Tridge, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apeel Sciences is on 62/100 and Tridge on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Apeel Sciences
- funding raised: $626M against $97.2M
Tridge
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 250 against 170
- LinkedIn following: 91,877 against 38,029
At a glance
| Measure | Apeel Sciences | Tridge |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops a plant-based coating to extend the shelf life of produce. | Global B2B marketplace and intelligence platform for the food, agriculture, and marine industries. |
| Category | AgTech, FoodTech, Sustainability, Waste Management | AgTech, FoodTech, Supply Chain, LogisticsTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | services | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Santa Barbara, United States | Seoul, South Korea |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apeel Sciences | Tridge |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 170 | 250 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -15.9% |
| Total funding | $626M | $97.2M |
| Latest round | Series G | Series D |
| Valuation | $2.5B | $2.7B |
| LinkedIn followers | 38,029 | 91,877 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apeel Sciences | Tridge |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 20/100 | Not published |
| Community | Not published | 10/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (29/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apeel Sciences | Tridge |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | AWS |
| CDN | Netlify | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Nuxt | Graphql |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel |
What users say
| Measure | Apeel Sciences | Tridge |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 4.0/5 from 1 vote |
Apeel Sciences vs Tridge: common questions
Which is better, Apeel Sciences or Tridge?
On our 0-100 score Apeel Sciences rates higher (62/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apeel Sciences and Tridge compare on the numbers?
Apeel Sciences leads on funding raised ($626M against $97.2M). Tridge leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 29/100), headcount (250 against 170), LinkedIn following (91,877 against 38,029).
Read the full Apeel Sciences review and pricing or the Tridge review and pricing. You can also browse other Apeel Sciences alternatives we track.