Apeel Sciences vs FREDsense
Apeel Sciences vs FREDsense, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apeel Sciences is on 62/100 and FREDsense on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Apeel Sciences
- our overall score: 62/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 29/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 170 against 35
- funding raised: $626M against $9.5M
- LinkedIn following: 38,029 against 2,877
FREDsense
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Apeel Sciences | FREDsense |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops a plant-based coating to extend the shelf life of produce. | FREDsense provides rapid, field-deployable biosensor technology for real-time water quality testing, specializing in PFAS detection. |
| Category | AgTech, FoodTech, Sustainability, Waste Management | AgTech, Water Treatment, Environmental Monitoring, Biosensors |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | services | Hardware, software, services |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Santa Barbara, United States | Calgary, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apeel Sciences | FREDsense |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 170 | 35 |
| Total funding | $626M | $9.5M |
| Latest round | Series G | Series A |
| Valuation | $2.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 38,029 | 2,877 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apeel Sciences | FREDsense |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 20/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (29/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 37/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apeel Sciences | FREDsense |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Self Managed |
| CDN | Netlify | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Nuxt | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Apeel Sciences vs FREDsense: common questions
Which is better, Apeel Sciences or FREDsense?
On our 0-100 score Apeel Sciences rates higher (62/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apeel Sciences and FREDsense compare on the numbers?
Apeel Sciences leads on our overall score (62/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (29/100 against 21/100), domain rating (64/100 against 37/100), headcount (170 against 35), funding raised ($626M against $9.5M), LinkedIn following (38,029 against 2,877).
Read the full Apeel Sciences review and pricing or the FREDsense review and pricing. You can also browse other Apeel Sciences alternatives we track.