Apache Solr vs Supabase
Apache Solr vs Supabase, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apache Solr is on 17/100 and Supabase on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Apache Solr
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Supabase
- our overall score: 70/100 against 17/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 27/100
At a glance
| Measure | Apache Solr | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source enterprise search platform built on Apache Lucene for full-text, vector, and geospatial search. | Open source Firebase alternative with a PostgreSQL backend and real-time capabilities. |
| Category | Enterprise Search, Search Platform, Open Source, Big Data | Database, Backend as a Service, Developer Tools, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2004 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Wakefield, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apache Solr | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 342 |
| Total funding | Not published | $933M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $11B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 99,093 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apache Solr | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 17/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 72/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (27/100) | C (66/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 93/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apache Solr | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Matomo | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Apache Solr vs Supabase: common questions
Which is better, Apache Solr or Supabase?
On our 0-100 score Supabase rates higher (70/100 against 17/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apache Solr and Supabase compare on the numbers?
Supabase leads on our overall score (70/100 against 17/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 27/100).
Read the full Apache Solr review and pricing or the Supabase review and pricing. You can also browse other Apache Solr alternatives we track.