Apache Solr vs ScyllaDB
Apache Solr vs ScyllaDB, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apache Solr is on 17/100 and ScyllaDB on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Apache Solr
- domain rating: 93/100 against 73/100
ScyllaDB
- our overall score: 67/100 against 17/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 27/100
At a glance
| Measure | Apache Solr | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source enterprise search platform built on Apache Lucene for full-text, vector, and geospatial search. | ScyllaDB is a high-performance, low-latency NoSQL database for data-intensive applications, designed to scale with modern infrastructure. |
| Category | Enterprise Search, Search Platform, Open Source, Big Data | Database, Enterprise, NoSQL, NoSQL Database |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2004 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Wakefield, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apache Solr | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 225 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +13.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $101M |
| Latest round | Not published | Debt |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 28,743 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apache Solr | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 17/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (27/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 93/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apache Solr | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Matomo | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Apache Solr | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads |
“My custom RDBMS is 588,235x faster than ScyllaDB on my laptop with fsync on executing a complex HTAP query.”r/Database
Apache Solr vs ScyllaDB: common questions
Which is better, Apache Solr or ScyllaDB?
On our 0-100 score ScyllaDB rates higher (67/100 against 17/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apache Solr and ScyllaDB compare on the numbers?
Apache Solr leads on domain rating (93/100 against 73/100). ScyllaDB leads on our overall score (67/100 against 17/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 27/100).
What do real users say about Apache Solr and ScyllaDB?
ScyllaDB: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Database.
Read the full Apache Solr review and pricing or the ScyllaDB review and pricing. You can also browse other Apache Solr alternatives we track.