Apache CouchDB vs ScyllaDB
Apache CouchDB vs ScyllaDB, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apache CouchDB is on 21/100 and ScyllaDB on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Apache CouchDB
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 93/100 against 73/100
ScyllaDB
- our overall score: 67/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Apache CouchDB | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An open-source, document-oriented NoSQL database implemented in Erlang, designed for reliability and seamless multi-primary synchronization. | ScyllaDB is a high-performance, low-latency NoSQL database for data-intensive applications, designed to scale with modern infrastructure. |
| Category | Database, NoSQL, Document Database, Open Source | Database, Enterprise, NoSQL, NoSQL Database |
| Sells toBusiness model | Open Source | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2005 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apache CouchDB | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 225 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +13.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $101M |
| Latest round | Not published | Debt |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 28,743 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apache CouchDB | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 21/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 25/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (55/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 93/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apache CouchDB | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Apache CouchDB | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads |
“My custom RDBMS is 588,235x faster than ScyllaDB on my laptop with fsync on executing a complex HTAP query.”r/Database
Apache CouchDB vs ScyllaDB: common questions
Which is better, Apache CouchDB or ScyllaDB?
On our 0-100 score ScyllaDB rates higher (67/100 against 21/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apache CouchDB and ScyllaDB compare on the numbers?
Apache CouchDB leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 46/100), domain rating (93/100 against 73/100). ScyllaDB leads on our overall score (67/100 against 21/100).
What do real users say about Apache CouchDB and ScyllaDB?
ScyllaDB: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Database.
Read the full Apache CouchDB review and pricing or the ScyllaDB review and pricing. You can also browse other Apache CouchDB alternatives we track.