Apache Cassandra vs ScyllaDB
Apache Cassandra vs ScyllaDB, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apache Cassandra is on 10/100 and ScyllaDB on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Apache Cassandra
- domain rating: 93/100 against 73/100
ScyllaDB
- our overall score: 67/100 against 10/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 225 against 4
- LinkedIn following: 28,743 against 3,667
At a glance
| Measure | Apache Cassandra | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source, distributed NoSQL database for handling large-scale, high-availability data without compromising performance. | ScyllaDB is a high-performance, low-latency NoSQL database for data-intensive applications, designed to scale with modern infrastructure. |
| Category | Database, Big Data, NoSQL, Data Center | Database, Enterprise, NoSQL, NoSQL Database |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2008 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apache Cassandra | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4 | 225 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +13.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $101M |
| Latest round | Not published | Debt |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,667 | 28,743 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apache Cassandra | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 10/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 25/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 93/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apache Cassandra | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Apache Cassandra | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads |
“My custom RDBMS is 588,235x faster than ScyllaDB on my laptop with fsync on executing a complex HTAP query.”r/Database
Apache Cassandra vs ScyllaDB: common questions
Which is better, Apache Cassandra or ScyllaDB?
On our 0-100 score ScyllaDB rates higher (67/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apache Cassandra and ScyllaDB compare on the numbers?
Apache Cassandra leads on domain rating (93/100 against 73/100). ScyllaDB leads on our overall score (67/100 against 10/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 32/100), headcount (225 against 4), LinkedIn following (28,743 against 3,667).
What do real users say about Apache Cassandra and ScyllaDB?
ScyllaDB: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Database.
Read the full Apache Cassandra review and pricing or the ScyllaDB review and pricing. You can also browse other Apache Cassandra alternatives we track.