Any.do vs Q Information Technologies
Any.do vs Q Information Technologies, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Any.do is on 42/100 and Q Information Technologies on 28/100.
Where each one leads
Any.do
- our overall score: 42/100 against 28/100
- agent readiness: 61/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 77/100 against 0/100
- headcount: 10 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 5,199 against 54
Q Information Technologies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Any.do | Q Information Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A simple productivity app for individuals and teams to manage tasks, calendars, and projects. | Mobile platform simplifying event creation and coordination through intelligent user input. |
| Category | Productivity, Scheduling, Assistant, Mobile | Productivity, Scheduling, Assistant, Mobile |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Any.do | Q Information Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 10 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -84.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $30.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Private Equity | Bootstrapped |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,199 | 54 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Any.do | Q Information Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 42/100 | 28/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 10/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 6/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (61/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 0/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Any.do | Q Information Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Any.do vs Q Information Technologies: common questions
Which is better, Any.do or Q Information Technologies?
On our 0-100 score Any.do rates higher (42/100 against 28/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Any.do and Q Information Technologies compare on the numbers?
Any.do leads on our overall score (42/100 against 28/100), agent readiness (61/100 against 22/100), domain rating (77/100 against 0/100), headcount (10 against 2), LinkedIn following (5,199 against 54).
Read the full Any.do review and pricing or the Q Information Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other Any.do alternatives we track.