Anvil Robotics vs Figure
Anvil Robotics vs Figure, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Anvil Robotics is on 43/100 and Figure on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Anvil Robotics
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 36/100
Figure
- our overall score: 57/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 32/100
- funding raised: $4.0B against $6.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Anvil Robotics | Figure |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Composable Physical AI hardware platform, "Legos for Robots", ready-to-go devkits for physical AI teams. | Building humanoid robots for commercial work, currently deployed at scale with BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Amazon. |
| Category | Robotics, Physical AI, Hardware, Artificial Intelligence | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Hardware, Physical AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware + Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2025 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Sunnyvale, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Anvil Robotics | Figure |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 673 |
| Total funding | $6.5M | $4.0B |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $4K |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 124,551 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Anvil Robotics | Figure |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 34/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 20/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 32/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Anvil Robotics | Figure |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Anvil Robotics | Figure |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“Figure 03 Robot sorting packages while Marc Benioff messes with it. https://x.com/Benioff/status/2036252519308075219”r/nextfuckinglevel
Anvil Robotics vs Figure: common questions
Which is better, Anvil Robotics or Figure?
On our 0-100 score Figure rates higher (57/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Anvil Robotics and Figure compare on the numbers?
Anvil Robotics leads on agent readiness (43/100 against 36/100). Figure leads on our overall score (57/100 against 43/100), domain rating (73/100 against 32/100), funding raised ($4.0B against $6.5M).
What do real users say about Anvil Robotics and Figure?
Figure: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/nextfuckinglevel.
Read the full Anvil Robotics review and pricing or the Figure review and pricing. You can also browse other Anvil Robotics alternatives we track.