Antimetal vs JumpCloud
Antimetal vs JumpCloud, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Antimetal is on 59/100 and JumpCloud on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Antimetal
- agent readiness: 65/100 against 49/100
JumpCloud
- our overall score: 68/100 against 59/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 54/100
- headcount: 979 against 19
- funding raised: $404M against $24.3M
- LinkedIn following: 92,228 against 5,832
At a glance
| Measure | Antimetal | JumpCloud |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform to automate cloud infrastructure management and optimize costs. | Cloud directory platform for identity and device management. |
| Category | Infrastructure Automation, DevOps, Cloud Cost Optimization, AI-driven Automation | Identity & Access Management (IAM), Identity & Access Management, Endpoint Security, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Louisville, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Antimetal | JumpCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 979 |
| Total funding | $24.3M | $404M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.6B |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,832 | 92,228 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Antimetal | JumpCloud |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 43/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (65/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 54/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Antimetal | JumpCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Antimetal vs JumpCloud: common questions
Which is better, Antimetal or JumpCloud?
On our 0-100 score JumpCloud rates higher (68/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Antimetal and JumpCloud compare on the numbers?
Antimetal leads on agent readiness (65/100 against 49/100). JumpCloud leads on our overall score (68/100 against 59/100), domain rating (80/100 against 54/100), headcount (979 against 19), funding raised ($404M against $24.3M), LinkedIn following (92,228 against 5,832).
Read the full Antimetal review and pricing or the JumpCloud review and pricing. You can also browse other Antimetal alternatives we track.