Antic vs StarkWare
Antic vs StarkWare, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Antic is on 35/100 and StarkWare on 73/100.
Where each one leads
Antic
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
StarkWare
- our overall score: 73/100 against 35/100
- agent readiness: 30/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 194 against 11
- headcount growth: +15.6% against -13.3%
- LinkedIn following: 20,607 against 1,494
At a glance
| Measure | Antic | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Antic builds web3 solutions for co-ownership in entertainment, gaming, and e-commerce. | Develops blockchain scaling solutions using STARK technology for Ethereum-secure, fast, and seamless user experiences. |
| Category | Blockchain, Payments, Fintech, Web3 | Blockchain, NFT, Crypto, Cryptocurrency |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Antic | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 11 | 194 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -13.3% | +15.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $180M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $8.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,494 | 20,607 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Antic | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 35/100 | 73/100 |
| Traction | 8/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 1/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Antic | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Not detected | Walletconnect |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Antic vs StarkWare: common questions
Which is better, Antic or StarkWare?
On our 0-100 score StarkWare rates higher (73/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Antic and StarkWare compare on the numbers?
StarkWare leads on our overall score (73/100 against 35/100), agent readiness (30/100 against 22/100), domain rating (71/100 against 1/100), headcount (194 against 11), headcount growth (+15.6% against -13.3%), LinkedIn following (20,607 against 1,494).
Read the full Antic review and pricing or the StarkWare review and pricing. You can also browse other Antic alternatives we track.