Anthropic vs OpenAI

Anthropic vs OpenAI, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Anthropic is on 76/100 and OpenAI on 82/100.

Anthropic logo
AnthropicAnthropic is an AI safety and research company building reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems, best known for the Claude family of models.
Try Anthropic
OpenAI logo
OpenAIArtificial intelligence research and deployment company focused on developing advanced AI models like GPT-5.6 and GPT-Live, offering products such as ChatGPT and an API platform.
Try OpenAI

Where each one leads

Anthropic

  • agent readiness: 46/100 against 39/100
  • funding raised: $317B against $21B

OpenAI

  • our overall score: 82/100 against 76/100
  • headcount: 10,452 against 5
  • headcount growth: +43.6% against -100.0%

At a glance

MeasureAnthropicOpenAI
What it isAnthropic is an AI safety and research company building reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems, best known for the Claude family of models.Artificial intelligence research and deployment company focused on developing advanced AI models like GPT-5.6 and GPT-Live, offering products such as ChatGPT and an API platform.
CategoryArtificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Frontier AI Lab, AGI ResearchFrontier AI Lab, AGI Research, Foundation Model, Large Language Model
Sells toBusiness modelB2BB2B, B2C
OfferingSoftwarePlatform
Founded20212015
HeadquartersSan Francisco, USASan Francisco, United States
StatusActiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureAnthropicOpenAI
Employees510,452
Headcount growthLast 12 months-100.0%+43.6%
Total funding$317B$21B
Latest roundSeries BShare Sale
Valuation$965B$500B
LinkedIn followersNot published11,484,918

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureAnthropicOpenAI
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating76/10082/100
Traction48/10060/100
Team70/10070/100
Community8/100Not published
Search visibility53/10065/100
Quality96/10098/100
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteD (46/100)F (39/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10092/10093/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureAnthropicOpenAI
HostingNot detectedVercel
CDNCloudflareCloudflare
CMSWebflowNot detected
FrameworksNot detectedNext.js, Tailwind CSS
PaymentsNot detectedStripe
AnalyticsNot detectedSingular
Support stackNot detectedDiscourse, Gradual

Anthropic vs OpenAI: common questions

Which is better, Anthropic or OpenAI?

On our 0-100 score OpenAI rates higher (82/100 against 76/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do Anthropic and OpenAI compare on the numbers?

Anthropic leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 39/100), funding raised ($317B against $21B). OpenAI leads on our overall score (82/100 against 76/100), headcount (10,452 against 5), headcount growth (+43.6% against -100.0%).

Read the full Anthropic review and pricing or the OpenAI review and pricing. You can also browse other Anthropic alternatives we track.