Anthropic vs DeepSeek
Anthropic vs DeepSeek, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Anthropic is on 76/100 and DeepSeek on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Anthropic
- our overall score: 76/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 35/100
- funding raised: $317B against $7.4B
DeepSeek
- headcount: 140 against 5
At a glance
| Measure | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Anthropic is an AI safety and research company building reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems, best known for the Claude family of models. | DeepSeek (深度求索), founded in 2023, is a Chinese company dedicated to making AGI a reality. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Frontier AI Lab, AGI Research | Foundation Model, Large Language Model, AGI Research, Generative AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | Not published |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | Hangzhou, China |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5 | 140 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -100.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $317B | $7.4B |
| Latest round | Series B | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $965B | $45B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 53/100 | 53/100 |
| Quality | 96/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 89/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
Anthropic vs DeepSeek: common questions
Which is better, Anthropic or DeepSeek?
On our 0-100 score Anthropic rates higher (76/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Anthropic and DeepSeek compare on the numbers?
Anthropic leads on our overall score (76/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 35/100), funding raised ($317B against $7.4B). DeepSeek leads on headcount (140 against 5).
Read the full Anthropic review and pricing or the DeepSeek review and pricing. You can also browse other Anthropic alternatives we track.