Anon vs Includer
Anon vs Includer, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Anon is on 55/100 and Includer on 6/100.
Where each one leads
Anon
- our overall score: 55/100 against 6/100
Includer
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Anon | Includer |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Integration platform for the AI Internet, enabling AI agents to act on behalf of users on websites without APIs. | The first fully automated Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) platform for local professionals. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, API Platform, Developer Tools | Agentic SEO, Generative AI, AI Search Engine, Web Search |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Anon | Includer |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 150 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +98.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $6.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,372 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Anon | Includer |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 6/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | Not published |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 39/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Anon | Includer |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Lovable |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Anon | Includer |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Complete Automation Toolkit, Granular Session Control, All Authentication Types Support, Security-First Architecture, Cross-Platform Compatibility, Developer-Friendly SDK | Not published |
Anon vs Includer: common questions
Which is better, Anon or Includer?
On our 0-100 score Anon rates higher (55/100 against 6/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Anon and Includer compare on the numbers?
Anon leads on our overall score (55/100 against 6/100).
Read the full Anon review and pricing or the Includer review and pricing. You can also browse other Anon alternatives we track.