Animoca Brands vs ENS (Ethereum Name Service)
Animoca Brands vs ENS (Ethereum Name Service), compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Animoca Brands is on 47/100 and ENS (Ethereum Name Service) on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Animoca Brands
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 26/100
- funding raised: $727M against $1.0M
ENS (Ethereum Name Service)
- our overall score: 53/100 against 47/100
At a glance
| Measure | Animoca Brands | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global leader in digital property rights for the metaverse and web3 gaming. | Decentralized naming system for the Ethereum blockchain, mapping human-readable names to Ethereum addresses and Web3 resources. |
| Category | Web3, Gaming, Metaverse, NFT | Web3, Blockchain, DeFi, Identity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Hong Kong, Hong Kong | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Animoca Brands | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 322 | Not published |
| Total funding | $727M | $1.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Grant |
| Valuation | $7.8B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 58,705 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Animoca Brands | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (26/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Animoca Brands | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Plausible |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Not detected | Crypto Payments |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Animoca Brands vs ENS (Ethereum Name Service): common questions
Which is better, Animoca Brands or ENS (Ethereum Name Service)?
On our 0-100 score ENS (Ethereum Name Service) rates higher (53/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Animoca Brands and ENS (Ethereum Name Service) compare on the numbers?
Animoca Brands leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 26/100), funding raised ($727M against $1.0M). ENS (Ethereum Name Service) leads on our overall score (53/100 against 47/100).
Read the full Animoca Brands review and pricing or the ENS (Ethereum Name Service) review and pricing. You can also browse other Animoca Brands alternatives we track.