Andpad vs eSUB
Andpad vs eSUB, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Andpad is on 51/100 and eSUB on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Andpad
- our overall score: 51/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 35/100
- funding raised: $103M against $10.0M
eSUB
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Andpad | eSUB |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A construction management application for users throughout Japan. | Construction project management software for subcontractors to track labor, equipment, and costs. |
| Category | Not published | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Project Management, Field Service Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | Tokyo, Japan | San Diego, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Andpad | eSUB |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $103M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Andpad | eSUB |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 40/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 12/100 | 3/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 63/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Andpad | eSUB |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment |
Andpad vs eSUB: common questions
Which is better, Andpad or eSUB?
On our 0-100 score Andpad rates higher (51/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Andpad and eSUB compare on the numbers?
Andpad leads on our overall score (51/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 35/100), funding raised ($103M against $10.0M).
Read the full Andpad review and pricing or the eSUB review and pricing. You can also browse other Andpad alternatives we track.