Anchor.dev vs Linx Security
Anchor.dev vs Linx Security, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Anchor.dev is on 13/100 and Linx Security on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Anchor.dev
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Linx Security
- our overall score: 55/100 against 13/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 39/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | Anchor.dev | Linx Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Security certificate management for developers, now part of Keycard Labs. | AI-native identity security and governance platform for human, machine, and AI agents. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Developer Tools, Infrastructure, Identity & Access Management | Cybersecurity, Identity Management, Identity & Access Management, AI-driven Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Anchor.dev | Linx Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 87 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +113.7% |
| Total funding | Not published | $89.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 7,085 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Anchor.dev | Linx Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 13/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 59/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 6/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 30/100 | 39/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Anchor.dev | Linx Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Flyio | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Anchor.dev vs Linx Security: common questions
Which is better, Anchor.dev or Linx Security?
On our 0-100 score Linx Security rates higher (55/100 against 13/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Anchor.dev and Linx Security compare on the numbers?
Linx Security leads on our overall score (55/100 against 13/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 41/100), domain rating (39/100 against 30/100).
Read the full Anchor.dev review and pricing or the Linx Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Anchor.dev alternatives we track.