Anchor browser vs Apify
Anchor browser vs Apify, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Anchor browser is on 40/100 and Apify on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Anchor browser
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Apify
- our overall score: 60/100 against 40/100
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 54/100
- headcount: 243 against 21
- LinkedIn following: 25,843 against 2,022
At a glance
| Measure | Anchor browser | Apify |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developer platform for reliable, enterprise-ready browser automation and agentic products. | A platform for web scraping, data extraction, and browser automation tools. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Agentic Browser, Browser Automation | Web Scraping, Data Extraction, Browser Automation, Generative AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Anchor browser | Apify |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 21 | 243 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $3.5M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,022 | 25,843 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Anchor browser | Apify |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 13/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 13/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (59/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 54/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Anchor browser | Apify |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, PostHog | Google Tag Manager, Segment |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Intercom, HubSpot |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | X402 | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Anchor browser | Apify |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 1 vote |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads |
“I found Apify’s flexibility, Bright Data’s power, and Octoparse being easy to use… they’re all basically packaging the same underlying stuff in different ways. My buddy had recs Apify Actors to me before, but if paying for, it mostly comes ”r/automation
Anchor browser vs Apify: common questions
Which is better, Anchor browser or Apify?
On our 0-100 score Apify rates higher (60/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Anchor browser and Apify compare on the numbers?
Apify leads on our overall score (60/100 against 40/100), agent readiness (59/100 against 53/100), domain rating (80/100 against 54/100), headcount (243 against 21), LinkedIn following (25,843 against 2,022).
What do real users say about Anchor browser and Apify?
Apify: 2 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/automation.
Read the full Anchor browser review and pricing or the Apify review and pricing. You can also browse other Anchor browser alternatives we track.