Anaplan vs Phocas
Anaplan vs Phocas, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Anaplan is on 20/100 and Phocas on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Anaplan
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 2,528 against 334
- LinkedIn following: 321,871 against 38,687
Phocas
- our overall score: 62/100 against 20/100
At a glance
| Measure | Anaplan | Phocas |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Anaplan is an AI-infused scenario planning and analysis platform designed to optimize decision-making for enterprises by connecting strategic, financial, and operational plans. | Integrated BI and FP&A platform for mid-market manufacturing, wholesale distribution, and retail. |
| Category | Agentic AI | Business Intelligence, Financial Planning & Analysis, Enterprise Software, Manufacturing Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2001 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Atlanta, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Anaplan | Phocas |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,528 | 334 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +24.7% |
| Total funding | Not published | $52.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 321,871 | 38,687 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Anaplan | Phocas |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 20/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Anaplan | Phocas |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Anaplan | Phocas |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Anaplan Intelligence, Data Management & Integrations, Modeling & Scalability, Planning Experience, Anaplan CoPlanner, Security & Administration | Not published |
Anaplan vs Phocas: common questions
Which is better, Anaplan or Phocas?
On our 0-100 score Phocas rates higher (62/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Anaplan and Phocas compare on the numbers?
Anaplan leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 43/100), domain rating (76/100 against 58/100), headcount (2,528 against 334), LinkedIn following (321,871 against 38,687). Phocas leads on our overall score (62/100 against 20/100).
Read the full Anaplan review and pricing or the Phocas review and pricing. You can also browse other Anaplan alternatives we track.