Anaphite vs Recurrent
Anaphite vs Recurrent, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Anaphite is on 49/100 and Recurrent on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Anaphite
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 42/100
Recurrent
- our overall score: 55/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 28/100
- funding raised: $16.0M against $3.4M
At a glance
| Measure | Anaphite | Recurrent |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Revolutionizing EV battery manufacturing with solvent-free dry coating technology for lithium-ion battery electrodes. | Data science company providing battery-monitoring tools and insights for electric vehicles (EVs). |
| Category | Automotive, Energy, Manufacturing, Materials Science | Automotive, Data Science, Electric Vehicles, EV Battery Analytics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Bristol, United Kingdom | Seattle, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Anaphite | Recurrent |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 47 | Not published |
| Total funding | $3.4M | $16.0M |
| Latest round | Series A Extension | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,341 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Anaphite | Recurrent |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 28/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Anaphite | Recurrent |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vultr | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Tiktok Pixel |
Anaphite vs Recurrent: common questions
Which is better, Anaphite or Recurrent?
On our 0-100 score Recurrent rates higher (55/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Anaphite and Recurrent compare on the numbers?
Anaphite leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 42/100). Recurrent leads on our overall score (55/100 against 49/100), domain rating (71/100 against 28/100), funding raised ($16.0M against $3.4M).
Read the full Anaphite review and pricing or the Recurrent review and pricing. You can also browse other Anaphite alternatives we track.