Amplication vs Supabase
Amplication vs Supabase, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Amplication is on 33/100 and Supabase on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Amplication
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Supabase
- our overall score: 70/100 against 33/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 342 against 30
- LinkedIn following: 99,093 against 3,602
At a glance
| Measure | Amplication | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source Node.js backend development platform for accelerating application development. | Open source Firebase alternative with a PostgreSQL backend and real-time capabilities. |
| Category | Enterprise, DevTools, Development, Developer Tools | Database, Backend as a Service, Developer Tools, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Amplication | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 30 | 342 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +1.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $933M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $11B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,602 | 99,093 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Amplication | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 33/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 15/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 72/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | C (66/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Amplication | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Vercel |
| CDN | Netlify | Vercel |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Amplication vs Supabase: common questions
Which is better, Amplication or Supabase?
On our 0-100 score Supabase rates higher (70/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Amplication and Supabase compare on the numbers?
Supabase leads on our overall score (70/100 against 33/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 46/100), domain rating (91/100 against 41/100), headcount (342 against 30), LinkedIn following (99,093 against 3,602).
Read the full Amplication review and pricing or the Supabase review and pricing. You can also browse other Amplication alternatives we track.