Amphorica vs FourKites
Amphorica vs FourKites, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Amphorica is on 25/100 and FourKites on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Amphorica
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
FourKites
- our overall score: 67/100 against 25/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 10/100
- headcount: 555 against 6
- LinkedIn following: 77,986 against 313
At a glance
| Measure | Amphorica | FourKites |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered smart logistics optimization and automation platform for predictive analytics. | Real-time supply chain visibility and orchestration platform powered by AI. |
| Category | Optimization, Automation, Transport and Logistics, LogisticsTech | LogisticsTech, Supply Chain, Enterprise Software, SaaS |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Chicago, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Amphorica | FourKites |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 6 | 555 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -11.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $242M |
| Latest round | Private Equity | Corporate Round (Strategic Investment) |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 313 | 77,986 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Amphorica | FourKites |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 25/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 8/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 10/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Amphorica | FourKites |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
Amphorica vs FourKites: common questions
Which is better, Amphorica or FourKites?
On our 0-100 score FourKites rates higher (67/100 against 25/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Amphorica and FourKites compare on the numbers?
FourKites leads on our overall score (67/100 against 25/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 21/100), domain rating (71/100 against 10/100), headcount (555 against 6), LinkedIn following (77,986 against 313).
Read the full Amphorica review and pricing or the FourKites review and pricing. You can also browse other Amphorica alternatives we track.