Amobee vs Quad Graphics
Amobee vs Quad Graphics, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Amobee is on 41/100 and Quad Graphics on Not scored yet.
Where each one leads
Amobee
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Quad Graphics
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 10,251 against 169
- headcount growth: +1.4% against -6.9%
- LinkedIn following: 77,544 against 34,855
At a glance
| Measure | Amobee | Quad Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global advertising technology company providing solutions for converged TV and digital advertising. | Marketing experience company solving complex marketing challenges with integrated print and digital solutions. |
| Category | Mobile, Advertising, AdTech, Advertising Platform | Marketing Services, Print Services, Digital Marketing, Omnichannel Marketing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2005 | 1971 |
| Headquarters | Foster City, United States | Sussex, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Amobee | Quad Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 169 | 10,251 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -6.9% | +1.4% |
| Total funding | $49.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 34,855 | 77,544 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Amobee | Quad Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | Not published |
| Traction | 58/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 30/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Amobee | Quad Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Amobee vs Quad Graphics: common questions
Which is better, Amobee or Quad Graphics?
On our 0-100 score Amobee rates higher (41/100 against Not scored yet). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Amobee and Quad Graphics compare on the numbers?
Quad Graphics leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 40/100), headcount (10,251 against 169), headcount growth (+1.4% against -6.9%), LinkedIn following (77,544 against 34,855).
Read the full Amobee review and pricing or the Quad Graphics review and pricing. You can also browse other Amobee alternatives we track.