Amobee vs Inneractive
Amobee vs Inneractive, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Amobee is on 41/100 and Inneractive on 44/100.
Where each one leads
Amobee
- headcount: 169 against 10
- funding raised: $49.0M against $11.8M
- LinkedIn following: 34,855 against 3,807
Inneractive
- our overall score: 44/100 against 41/100
- headcount growth: +500.0% against -6.9%
At a glance
| Measure | Amobee | Inneractive |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global advertising technology company providing solutions for converged TV and digital advertising. | Inneractive was a mobile ad exchange and monetization platform for app developers and publishers, acquired by Fyber in 2016. |
| Category | Mobile, Advertising, AdTech, Advertising Platform | Mobile, Monetization, App, Advertising |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2005 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Foster City, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Amobee | Inneractive |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 169 | 10 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -6.9% | +500.0% |
| Total funding | $49.0M | $11.8M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 34,855 | 3,807 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Amobee | Inneractive |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Amobee | Inneractive |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Amobee vs Inneractive: common questions
Which is better, Amobee or Inneractive?
On our 0-100 score Inneractive rates higher (44/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Amobee and Inneractive compare on the numbers?
Amobee leads on headcount (169 against 10), funding raised ($49.0M against $11.8M), LinkedIn following (34,855 against 3,807). Inneractive leads on our overall score (44/100 against 41/100), headcount growth (+500.0% against -6.9%).
Read the full Amobee review and pricing or the Inneractive review and pricing. You can also browse other Amobee alternatives we track.