Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Applied Digital
Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Applied Digital, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Amazon Web Services (AWS) is on Not scored yet and Applied Digital on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
- domain rating: 96/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 159,751 against 229
- LinkedIn following: 10,774,317 against 37,106
Applied Digital
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 32/100
At a glance
| Measure | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Applied Digital |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A subsidiary of Amazon providing on-demand cloud computing platforms and APIs to individuals, companies, and governments. | AI data center operator |
| Category | Cloud Computing, Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), Software as a Service (SaaS) | Neocloud, AI Infrastructure, GPU, Cloud Computing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2006 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, United States | Santa Clara, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Applied Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 159,751 | 229 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +6.9% | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,774,317 | 37,106 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Applied Digital |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | Not published | 47/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 65/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 96/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Applied Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | React | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Applied Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 4 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads |
“Applied Digital ($APLD) just crossed 1 GW of contracted capacity, and the same hyperscaler from last month came back for a second 300 MW lease. APLD signed a new 15-year take-or-pay lease at Polaris Forge 3 worth about $7.5B base, up to $18”r/APLDSTOCK
Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Applied Digital: common questions
Which is better, Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Applied Digital?
On our 0-100 score Applied Digital rates higher (47/100 against Not scored yet). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Applied Digital compare on the numbers?
Amazon Web Services (AWS) leads on domain rating (96/100 against 55/100), headcount (159,751 against 229), LinkedIn following (10,774,317 against 37,106). Applied Digital leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 32/100).
What do real users say about Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Applied Digital?
Applied Digital: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/APLDSTOCK.
Read the full Amazon Web Services (AWS) review and pricing or the Applied Digital review and pricing. You can also browse other Amazon Web Services (AWS) alternatives we track.